Week 4 : Fandango a go + eBay is a no-go

Week 4:

Two sites that I use regularly are Fandango and eBay. Even though I use them, they both aren't great.

GOOD UX: Fandango is straight forward, nice looking and helps choose the theatre for you. You can look ahead and look forward to new movies coming out near you. It only takes 2 or 3 steps to buy the tickets, choose your seat, and pay.

BAD UX: eBay is an app that I use to find specific items that are either sold out or discontinued. However, they do a few annoying things on their site that I despise. First, they have a few rows of recently viewed items. I'm sure they think this is great but I always think about what if I search for something embarrassing and then it'll always be displayed. Second, if you aren't searching for a specific item, it is tough to navigate with so many "vertical" product categories. I use the eBay app with efficiency, I get in and get out.

Comments

Week 11 : Persol is cool + Ray-Ban is bland

Week 11 Persol is cool I was pretty hard on Walmart in my last post for their minimal, design—that is because minimal isn't what they are about, Walmart is selling everything and I couldn't tell that. On the other hand, Persol should and does have a minimal experience that feels right. They have a small assortment of quality eyeglasses and this works for them. I can focus on the product and not be distracted by the overly designed elements like Zara does. Ahh, I just want to look at the details of my future pair of glasses. So refreshing. Ray-Ban is bland It is frustrating when websites have a popup right when you visit the site. It makes me not even want to enter. Not sure why Ray-Ban does this, it feels like they put a wall up that I need to jump over. There is an exclusives section that seduced me into viewing but I quickly just wasn't sure what I was looking at. Certain companies are starting to ride on their laurels that the customer...

Week 3 : Paypal is awesome + MS Word isn't awesome

Week 3: GOOD UX: Paypal I use Paypal constantly for work. It is very clear, intuitive, and communicative. For example, I sold a few items on eBay this week. Once I received their payment, Paypal notified me that those funds aren't actually available to me until they receive my product. Since they let me know that clearly, it was not a problem, made sense, and I had no stress about getting paid. However, without their great communication experience, I would have been stressed out and probably emailed them asking why my money isn't available to be transferred out yet. BAD UX: Microsoft Word It seems to me that many of Microsoft's software, especially Word, have very unintuitive UX. The menus use small symbols and the most commonly needed functions are tough to find. I can't wait for someone to design a better standardly used software.

Week 9 : Asos is Awesome + Zara is Na-wesome

Week 9 Asos is Awesome Asos is a photography-forward design. Very visual and minimal use of type. The categories are laid out clearly and they have so many ways to navigate to the same product, rather through searching by clothing type or activity type. It seems very functional and user friendly. Zara is Na-wesom I know it is their aesthetic that they are trying to achieve, an "I'm not trying" look. Very maximal and I think they want the viewer to feel like it was a natural experimental design that they are trying to achieve. However, the legibility, readability, and functionality is suffering—and making it painful for the customer. Here are some of the visually overloaded landing pages. I tried to take snap shots of the animation, but that may be in the code. A lot of these pages have other graphics moving around that the screen capture wasn't able to see.

RUXY

Search This Blog